So how is that Roeders fault?

I think we are better off with the first 11 we have now over the first 11 at the infamous Plymouth game over 1 year ago.

If we still had Hucks I dont think anyone would disagree.

Outside of Hucks every player GR has got rid of or loaned out has done virtually nothing.

IF GR gets a mid table finish we would probably be over achieving.

The vast majority of teams above have more money and quality.

Blaming Roeder for strange tactics and being an arrogant dick is fair game but to blame him for having too many loans and the quality of the players is not looking at the big picture.

He is having to take a flyer on players like Carl Cort.

Of course he would rather have someone a bit more proven (better)
They dont come any cheaper than pay as you play deals.

On the basis of play this year most people agree that we should be a little highre in the table but frankly not much.
We are a long way from chasing a playoff place.

Posted By: usacanary, Dec 26, 17:56:34