That can't be right, can it?

If you assume a ?10 bet on City losing every time, surely the winnings from the 50% correct bets would be well ahead of the loss of the 50% losing stakes?

Unless the odds were incredibly ungenerous

Damn, I may have to take SCC off ignore again to find out what he says, he's rather good at this sort of thing

Posted By: Old Git, Nov 21, 14:50:12