don't you think any signing where you never actually play the player once

is a bit whiffy?

Whatever your view on Roeder is (and I think he's done a god jo so far) you have to admit that his use of the loan system is controversial.

So when you have a loanee in who, it appears, has immediately proved himself to be nowhere near up to the job, it should be noted. Not just ignored.

Remember - we're paying for him, he's fit, we're desperately short of players at CB today, and he hasn't even made the squad. You don't think that's worthy of comment?

Posted By: Tricky Hawes, Oct 4, 14:36:43