There's a guy on the Oinkun who has the 'signature' (hate them) that says

he wants the club to spend over 31% of turnover on players wages.

Prime example of this (forgetting for now that these accounts show we have done that, he seems to be ignoring that).

What do these people expect though? We've all seen the losses, and know what the wage bill msut come down to for us to break even.
Yet people still believe that spunking the majority of your income on WAGES for players alone, is a viable option for a football club.

Gob smacking.

Posted By: megson, Oct 2, 10:37:04