Roeder...If you are cash strapped then

like i said in july when you were getting bell,why go for another midfield player when it was obvious that 2 big target men would have been a better piority,to play along cureton or whoever!
This has been proven by all accounts,as according to most reports,in our 1st 2 games, the only area lettin us down is the strikers!
In coventry match,they were resticted to 5 shots,and according to roeder,in both games the only thing required of marshy was to pick the ball out of the net! (todays evening paper).
So this suggests to me that with bell out till whenever and thats even if we need his services, the piority and money shoouldve have been used to secure a proven target man!.and then if needed concentrate on backing uo other areas!
But this would all be irrevelant if the board would have made the money available for all roeders targets,to have been secured before the season kick off. And if they couldnt provide the necessary funds then please leave and hand over the reigns to someone who can!!
Has roeder failed to pioritise or is the board to blame for not backing him to the hilt..and before any1 defends the board with "roeder will not be held to ransom over a purchase" crp, as that would be biting off our nose to spite our face! as the longer we leave our striker problem,then the harder it will be to climb out of the bottom 3!

Posted By: barclayspirit, Aug 13, 13:14:37