as I'm a forensicist

always had doubt in the conviction... Such a small amount of residue really shouldn't have had so much weight put on it. Still, jurors quite easily swayed by a plausible scientist...

On a similar theme most of my colleagues were surprised that Steve Wright was convicted with the limited fibre evidence that was put to the jury; can see continuous appeals from him and a similar result to George in the future...

Posted By: Gunnys mullet, Aug 1, 15:31:13