Having now read the article, a couple of things...

1. He doesn't actually mention debt - surely the most important thing is to clear the debt? All he mentions is ?20mil for player purchases.

2. "Not going to keep putting more and more money into the club" - so is this it? ?20mil and that's all? Don't we need someone a bit more longer term than that?

3. He wants to put his own people in place "to create an exciting strategy for the club". A bit vague isn't it? I'd want to know more.

Anyone else notice this?

Posted By: LincolnshireCanary, Jun 30, 08:33:35