OG

I often get told I'm never wrong, which isn't true, I'm an extremely honest person. It's more likely that someones seen me apologise, seen it as a weakness, and feel its something they can use to get the upper hand. I’ll be told I’m wrong, or I can never be wrong, to get me to back down (that's a reply to your cartoon)

I'm well aware of this tactic from social situations.

The other day you lambasted Discodalegordon and alan for finding something funny, when you actually thoguht it was Disco Dale G. Megson apologised for thinking the same thing, but you went quiet. So in that sense, you don't like being wrong either, and you probably feel the same as the above, that it's a weakness to admit being wrong. I think it's a strength. The thing about that too, is you fell for the steve in Holland win win situation trick, where he posts a gag, but words it so he could mean it as serious, or a joke. If someone takes exception, he claims he was being serious, if everyone laughs, he takes credit for being a comedian. He’s very good at doing it, and often the gag is what he’s aimed at, but has the get out clause

Today you've brought up racism AGAIN, when there's an increase in sluring on here recently, some direct, and it's going unnoticed, yet you feel to need to single me out for using the word nip, as in nipping at someone

Yet the posts yesterday that said "FAO Barack Obama, it's call the Whitehouse for a reason, wasn't pulled up at all. Neither have the nippon jokes today, or pikey stuff yesterday, or the cloggy stuff. I'm not getting into a racism debate with you because I haven't been racist. Why you felt you had to bring that up, is beyond me, maybe you feel I need to be taught a lesson else where from today

Then you accuse me of bullying Phrankin when I just tired of his daily negative bull about this club, it's never positive

The facts in his posts are often ignored to emphasize his point, and then he questions them until proved. Once they are, he still denies them cos he believes what he wants to. In that sense NCFC is just one big conspiracy of gloom to him

I'm guessing I've been a bit of a t**t on here recently which is why a few have supported him over it. I didn't get very personal at all (unlike other direct remarks I got), and I also wasn't the only one who didn't agree with him

On the subject of bullying, I notice when ied logs in, he cops a load of unwarranted grief, which is a bit rich considering I've been lectured about bullying. I’d like to know what you think about that as you were one of them

I can't really comment on the granny thing, you told people they couldn't laugh at something the other day (discodalegordon thing), yet you feel it's appropriate to take the humour out my family and think it's acceptable. I commend scott for saying something, I largely avoided it because it will just be in joke if protests go too far (ala brandon’s mate at the fa, or not as the case is)

I'm not having a go at you, I'm just pointing out the various things that I have been accused of today, and am reacting to the same things that have occured since, but have not been accused

This place has no real balance or structure anymore, one day the moral high ground is taken, the next it's out the window. You used to be consistent in this, now you are quite selective when it suits

Today it appears it's been taken mainly because I have been deemed to be annoying

In that sense I guess others think it's ok cos I deserve it. Maybe I do. But it should just be said like that, instead of dressing it up with finger pointing of things I haven’t done.

Especially when I haven’t been very personal with anyone really, yet can you actually say the same thing towards me?

I just thought I'd clear that up

off my chest, and tomorrows another day. Others can rip this to bits, and will

Bring it on

Posted By: pants, Jun 12, 17:30:48