i agree

and he didn't so he's not all that good at his job

also his job title suggested that he had editorial control over the event, which i took to mean that he had a big say in the acts that were chosen to appear which is the bit that most people seem to have taken issue with so again it's not looking like he's doing his job all that well

and, well anyway, who cares, why are we even bothering to discuss some bloke who neither of us knows doing some job which neither of us is particularly sure entails

Posted By: blindasabat, May 14, 10:56:46