I think he's done a mash of his faves/the usual suspects...

plus stuck in some "These players were big internationals". It doesn't make sense. Is it a list based on a opinion or are we supposed to compile an index of key stats on who reached the highest level and did they do well there of which there could only be one top 5 which could not be argued against.

Posted By: sheffieldcanary, Feb 19, 13:31:19