I think you're putting words in a lot of people's mouths which just aren't there

Some people think Roeder is absolutely right, Hucks gets no free games just for being him, loans are the future, we need to kepe Wenger happy, hucks is of anyway, Hucks is difficult to fit in the team, Hucks doesn't defend, Roeder knows what he's doing. I thought you were in that camp.

Other people think that Hucks is still quality, he can still turn a game, he's miles better than Gibbs, he should at least be on the bench, leaving him oput of the squad is poor management. I'm in that camp.

Being in the second camp doesn't mean you're anti Roeder on everything. It means you think Roeder has got this one wrong.

Posted By: Old Git, Feb 16, 17:18:49