Agreed, we can't buy them we don't "need" them and the risk upsetting the players we own..

There's no comparison to the first bunch of loans. IE we needed them cause the players we had weren't doing their jobs, there was/is a possibility of signing them and they weren't pushing performing players down the list.

It annoys me, Roeder has got this, but only this wrong

Posted By: greendude, Feb 13, 16:53:24