ok, then - point by point:

Signing fat has been attackers is not the answer.

- No, possibly not. But if he is fitter than we are assuming, then he could be an asset.

Since that inept muppet Grant forced Safri out the
club we have not had any quality in the centre of
midfield.

- How do you know Grant forced Safri out? Did Safri tell you? And how is that Doncaster's fault?

Until you have some creativity in centre midfield,
someone who can pick a pass unlike Russell etc, no
attacker is going to score goals.

- Smith, Fozzy. Doncaster must have injured them for that one to be his fault.

If you appoint Mr 'three relegations' Duffy as manager
with Bryan "Mr Fix it" Gunn as his side kick expect
trouble with the fans.

- Ok, so now we're calling him a muppet, why exactly? Becasue of rumours that we might appoint Duffy. That's nice, call him a clown because of a rumour started on a message board.

How can someone like Gunn, who has been out of the
game for 10 years selling corporate boxes etc,
suddenly come in as our transfer Guru? The answer is
he can't hence the s**t we have wasted money on!

- Closer to your way of thinking here - however do you know Gunn personally? Do you know his qualities? No. And didnt Grant appoint him anyway?

Inviting Dave Stringer to help pick the last manager
was another master stroke!! Stringer, good manager
that he was in his day, had been out of the game for
20 years when you clowns on the board asked him to
help appoint the new manager. Football suprisingly has
moved on.

- You are speaking as if Stringer had the last word. What do you want the board to do? If they dont ask for helkp on the footbal matters, we'd string them up for that, as well. How many 'boards' are there out there that are any more 'football astute' than Smith and Jones? More to the point, who do you ask for help if not a former manager? A current manager? A MOTD pundit?

Yep, all the above are valid reasons why the board is failing.

Posted By: Yellalee, Oct 12, 21:54:06