Exactly

and 18 months down the line and we're still debating about what a soft touch we are in the transfer market.

How can the board possibly think the fans would fall for the "injury" claim?

He played in virtually every game of the season, we play West Ham and he's "injured". He then plays the next game and signs for West Ham after that.

Anyway, my point is we should have signed Earnshaw way before 9pm on transfer deadline day.

Posted By: Ian S, Jul 18, 12:23:44