Hmmm. Knee jerk ad hominem attack.

Why don't you question the science presented rather than attack the producer? Or are you just confirming that the whole question of anthropogenic global warming is not a scientific but political one?

That programme was indeed very one-sided, but it was a polemic, not a documentary. If you're going to attack it, attack the scientific statements made. For example, are there arguments against the theory that increased CO2 lags behind historic temperature increases? Is it true that the overwhelming driver of climatic change is the Sun?

Labelling people deniers in the pay of petrochemical companies is Religion, not science.

Posted By: yarmyyarmy, Mar 9, 10:01:26