One rule for us and one rule for them eh ?

User Posted Link

This bit:

"An RSPCA spokeswoman said it had investigated whether the fox was caused unnecessary suffering and whether any legislation established to protect wildlife had been breached.

?We have investigated and concluded there are no grounds for a prosecution,? she said. ?An independent post mortem examination was carried out and found that the fox died from gunshot wounds and no evidence of other injury or trauma was found."

How can being killed for somebody else's pleasure EVER be necessary suffering ?

Posted By: Steve in Holland, Feb 2, 11:22:42