As I have said before on this bb - where Chase went wrong was not raising money via a share issue when the club was doing very well. He probably didn't want to dilute his holding. In those days long term financing such as that for the Jarrold stand was not available to NCFC.
Now taking us back to the general operations (which is the focus of my original post) of the club, do you deny that the club has spent alot on the ground and facilities in the last four seasons ?
Do you deny that the current regime has sold our better players in the past just like Chase ?
Do you deny that the current regime has bought land
(ex LSE, ex City Council) just like Chase ?
Apart from the last couple of seasons under the Chase regime, please tell me how the regime's differ ?
Posted By: Commisar_Canary, Jan 8, 10:11:40
Written & Designed By Ben Graves 1999-2025