I'm sorry, but that's just more speculative nonsense from a God Botherer.

It's filled with confirmation bias, i.e. ignore the overwhelming evidence and carefully choose the information you want.

I'll repeat it ad nauseam. "Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof."

Here's an example of the kind of "logic" in these theories. People saw some white puffs of smoke on the towers (that had just been hit by a fuel-laden 500mh projectile), therefore they must have been indicative of thermite, therefore the buildings were brought down by controlled explosion.
Let's ignore the *real* structural engineers who investigated and discovered what happened, User Posted Link
No doubt, they are gullible fools, rather than experts in their fields.
Besides, what on earth would be the point of bringing the towers down? Weren't the planes enough of a show?

Posted By: yarmyyarmy, Oct 16, 10:44:00