Thing is, you can prove anything with conspiracy theories

Partly because they often don't require anything as inconvenient as proof and partly because the overriding premise is that the protagonists (in this case, the US government or their agents acting with or without authority - it's never quite explained ...) are all powerful. Thus any rebuttal - even if based on compelling and credible evidence - is met with "well, that just shows how deep the conspiracy gos ..."

While it's credible that 19 terrorists could attend flight schools and hijack four aircraft and keep it secret from somnambulant and/or incompetent security services. It's a huge leap of the imagination for a government conspiracy to be so well hidden and to be so well executed it looks like it's been done by terrorists. And then cover it up afterwards and provide all the evidence that third parties (eg. police, FBI, fire brigade, structural engineers, air crash investigators) will be investigating. Not to mention the hundreds of eye-witnesses who largely corroborate the official line. That would require the involvement, cooperation and trust of, perhaps, hundreds of people. A huge logistical task in itself. And not one of them has a conscience (after all we're talking about cold-bloodedly murdering thousands of their own people) and has talked? And then to do the same in the UK (it follows, logically, that if 9/11 was a conspiracy then so must be 7/7)? They couldn't even keep the Tonkin Bay Incident secret and that was thousands of miles away.

I will not waste time attempting to rebut any of your points, but I assume you've read the rebuttals to Loose Change on the internet. Oh, and the official inquiry report that you so casually dismiss?

Pants, it's just a distraction from the real crimes that are being and have been committed by our leaders (which is why I posted those links). The conspiracy theories are just wasting your time.

Posted By: BerlinCanary, Aug 16, 21:48:56