Is it possible that Worthington's style of management gives a

lot more responsibility than usual to the assistant ? And that Steve Foley being replaced by Hunter has made as big a difference in real terms as if Worthington had been replaced ?

Or is it possible that the Board liked many aspects of Worthy's management but felt he needed help from a more tactical coach, re-organised his responsibilities to give more tactical input from the coach and THAT was the reason why Foley was dismissed for Hunter ?

Perhaps that has made the difference ?

Posted By: Steve in Holland, Aug 9, 10:14:12