So, let's get this straight

I think we played well last night, I really enjoyed the passing and we won. Fantastic.

However, does that mean that no-one is allowed to give an opinion or some constructive comment as to why things won't always be so easy if we play 4-5-1 at home? Some of you are pathetic.

Do you seriously think that NW and MH won't be watching the video and thinking exactly the same things as Neil Adams and the more sensible posters on here are saying about getting more support for Earnie in the box?

If we play 4-5-1 and we get more support in the box more quickly for Earnie then some of the crosses might be converted. However, if we play the way we played last night then there will be - at home at least - a few 0-0s and a few 0-1s.

Which might explain why NW is desperately trying to get in a target man! Hopefully not so we can hoof it to him, but so we can still get the ball wide the Hucks and Croft and have someone on the end of their crosses.

Some people on here are like a bunch of children who won't tolerate any adverse comment AT ALL about a winning performance. That attitude will egt you nowhere fast.

Posted By: duke of york, Aug 9, 09:27:33