Well, what he does very well is...

1) to be so ambigious as to be able to make his description sound correct in hindsight. Very Nostradamus.
2) to remind you over and over again about the correct ones, ensuring that noise drowns out the silence following all the incorrect ones.

I'd say he's proven to be occasional informative but on the whole less accurate than DoY or Dan the Man.

Still, his comments are very welcome unless he's banging on about it

Posted By: Steve in Holland, Jun 20, 15:11:31