Confidence is infectious. And don't even dare to suggest

that PotS is a reliable indicator of performance!

If Gunn was objectively poor season then why does the GK dept believe he cannot achieve his [good] levels of 23/24?

And spending a 600,000 fee on a #2 GK suggests the Gunn decision was not primarily fiscal

Posted By: Henclrikus, Jun 16, 16:08:47