Yeah, USAC is right when he says it's easy to see whether a club is over/under performing

But it's harder to see what the driver of that over / under performance is in isolation of the other factors.

Farke was sacked for under performing when he probably wasn't given how poor our squad was.

Harder to dissect whether Wagner or Smith under performed, although surely the latter did given we had parachute payments?

Possibly under performance is more obvious in the case of JHT given he didn't seem to be able to motivate the squad and performances were getting steadily worse.

But yes, you've got a point if your point is how do you objectively measure the performance of the manager in isolation given the number of other variables that have a massive impact on his success.

Posted By: SimonOTBC, Jun 10, 14:00:24