I doubt it

We paid his wages for many years.

And anyway haven’t they made about 10m after Man City’s take?

His fee was rising to 20m. I doubt it would hit the top number since they got relegated.

It’s funny because they didn’t get the 79m+ they were convinced they would get for him, but it’s still financially successful. Like having a loan striker score about the same as Pukki, but being paid to have him.

Posted By: Legacy Fan, May 30, 13:18:39