Im asking questions, fuelling debate, why do certain people on here get irate?

It's not about winning 6-0, its about what use the game served, and I didn't think it served any

If you want some balance Judge, I'll give you the same view on the chech republic

Here is their 3 warm up games for the world cup


Saudi Arabia 0-2 Czech Republic 26-05-2006
Czech Republic 1-0 Costa Rica 30-05-2006
Czech Republic vs Trinidad 03-06-2006

I failed to see why playing Saudi is a test but then again Saudi have qualified, and at least the Cech's went away from home to get more of a test

Costa Rica are also weak opposition, I haven't any details about the game. But today they are playing Trinidad and Tobago, which just like the england game to me, is a waste of time

They are 3 up at half time, they'll be strolling around the pitch bored and I'd like to think a few are questioning why they haven't played someone like Turkey like they did in march for a good solid international warm up test

It surprises you that I aren't impressed with today, I did call it before kick off though, you can't just throw the "England won 6-0 today and pants is still blubbing" crap at me, and then question my intelligence. Try some sort of consistency. Plus where are my rants about the Hungary and Belarus games if you think I have so much of a problem. Or have I fallen for the internet bandwagon wind up and thats why people can't replie without naughty swear words and belittling (all that's left now is to accuse me of crying victim everytime I provoke a genuine debate and we'll have a full house)

Hungary and Belarus were brilliant games to have. Possibly would have been better friendlies away from home, seen as England are actually going to play on away soil!

Posted By: pants, Jun 3, 18:13:12