That was not my point

My point was he is no better than what has been in front of him in the past 4 years.

Mcveigh
Huckerby
Crouch
Ashton
Earnshaw
Mckenzie
Johansson

Jarvis is not as good as any of the above, but he is beter than Thorne and Hammond, who are back up players themselves. Hence why he hasnt played more, because hes not good enough. If he really was that good why are we not sending him on loan, dont clubs want him on loan? Colchester did, they sent him nback after no goals in 6 games as hes not up to it.

Dont get me wrong i would love it if we had some youngsters that were up to the job, sadly i think our academy is a joke compared to the one (dare i say it) down the road

Posted By: DiscoDaleGordon, Jun 1, 09:09:09