Going off on a tangent....

but with Broad, yes, he should have walked but in this day and age, very few batsmen do. I doubt Aussie batsmen walk either.

It actually wasn't as big an edge as it looked, it came off the keepers gloves, which the umpire saw too. In any case, why would the size of the edge be the determining factor in whether he should have walked? Is a small edge less out than a big one?

We all know the aussies don't walk anyway, so can't see where it comes into anything.

Posted By: SimonOTBC, Jul 3, 12:45:46