is this, objectively, our worst set of transfers in a season?
User Posted Link
We'll have had spells where we signed worst players (Derveld, De-waard etc etc) but factoring in how much we spent (wages for those loans were not cheap), what we needed to improve the squad, and the opportunity in front of us, have we utterly blown it more spectacularly than this?
Posted By: megson, Apr 20, 09:40:20
Follow Ups
- I think our loan signings have been by far the worst.
Posted By: usacanary, Apr 20, 17:22:31 - Cost vs capability though, Wildschut must be up there. Ricky was just
Posted By: Legacy Fan, Apr 20, 13:06:26 - 5Jason Jarrett, Andy Hughes, Peter Thorne, Matthieu Louis-Jean
Posted By: Adster, Apr 20, 12:39:04 - 1Yes.set being the operative word imo,individually they're decent players
Posted By: protheroe fitzgibbon, Apr 20, 12:31:01 - Yeah...
Posted By: trafford_canary, Apr 20, 11:59:52 - It’s a Webber signing so best to assume they’re shite.
Posted By: thirsty work, Apr 20, 11:39:38 - 6I think it is fair to say that we have had terrible signings before Webber's era
Posted By: Knitted Jesus, Apr 20, 10:53:15 - In pissing money up the wall terms, yes
Posted By: jamesward, Apr 20, 10:01:35 - 5Financially I'd say so, Worthy's post prem swoops were dodgy
Posted By: inutero, Apr 20, 10:00:23 - 2We aren’t used to having money. It’s like lottery winners blowing it on gold plated Greggs
Posted By: Legacy Fan, Apr 20, 09:45:24
Reply to Message
Written & Designed By Ben Graves 1999-2025