Sue their arses off

It's all about the proof though - you really need Wayback or similar. You've got some bits and bobs so you can definitely make a fist of it, but in an ideal world you'd have evidence of that original description (you mug). Then you could show all the changes they've made and they'd be f**ked (especially if you could show that they've dropped the price as well?).

Low risk option is ABTA - these trade schemes are usually quite good but tend to be a bit slow, and you aren't at costs risk.

Higher risk (since you might have to pay a bit if you lose, but it's unlikely to be much) is using the Small Claims Court. That would put pressure on them. This is where I'd go if I were you - IF you can put together good evidence of the difference between what they described and what you got.

Stuff about Small Claims here User Posted Link and here User Posted Link

Go gettem tiger

Posted By: Old Git, Feb 10, 11:39:41