If you mean Gibson for their goal he really didn’t have a choice

Was one on one in loads of space with a big gap to the attacker who had space to run at him.

I wondered myself but think if he’d have committed the attacker would easily have beaten him as he could have chosen either direction and then it was a certain goal. He chose instead to make the shot more difficult. But it was also a good finish.

Posted By: Legacy Fan, Nov 5, 22:02:26