So, no-one has started a Smith Vs Farke thread today

Yet.

Which is nifty, because it really feels like a strawman argument.

I quite like that Smith is trying out new stuff and tactics - though think evolution of the approaches that have been working during the recent good run, rather than wholesale change, still feels the best plan.

The next stretch is the main test, as in this division it really is how you bounce back from a poor result which makes the difference.

In general feel that Smith is doing an decent job. Can also feel that Knudsen (or the like) might have been a better option back when we made the change.

Life is shades of grey (more than 59), innit?

Posted By: Cardiff Canary, Oct 9, 11:18:58