It's disingenuous

As a run implies unbroken and (broadly) under the same conditions.

Presenting it in the manner you have is to weight a substantial chunk of the responsibility of the run to Farke alone.

That, in my opinion, is nonsense.

Different squad, different opposition, wildly different circumstances and also, weirdly completely ignores a very successful year of results in the middle of the 'run'

Also, so that we're being precise, I never said that your stat was unclear - I said it was a wilful obfuscation. Which it is, and which this response further doubles down on.

Stats shorn of their context can be incredibly misleading. This is an object lesson in that.

Posted By: Cardiff Canary, Sep 20, 10:46:20