possibly

tis interesting Beckham played 27 games and they lost seven though

If you take the argument that in the 6 they didn't lose they might have played teams they should easily beat, then in the 7 out of the 27 there must have been at least 4 sides they should have easily beat too

Without someone jumping back into the debate that it isn't Beckhams fault for a team losing. I have debated for years what the england team would be like without him in. The 6 games without losing with him missing from the real team is a small foresight into the fact that maybe he just isn't the influential genius that everyone thinks

Posted By: pants, May 9, 12:16:49