I'm at work. I read the article over a sandwich earlier

You basically agree below. The physical and biological advantage carried across with the change of gender is an unfair advantage. You only need to look at the pictures of the women alongside other competitors to see that.

It makes the line about ignorance of biology is an odd one. The physical differences and attributes of birth men and women are about as basic as biology gets.

The fact that the fight happened 8 years ago is neither here nor there. It happened. I inadvertently saw a clip of it and watched out of morbid curiosity. It was brutal. She absolutely overpowered the other fighter in every respect. The physical advantage was so obvious it was really uncomfortable to watch. I can't stand MMA or boxing myself so I may be oversensitive.

The article you linked is 7 years old. Is there a cut off point for relevance?

Posted By: Captain Bligh, Mar 21, 18:46:20