Hard to pin the blame fully on Farke. Seems more like a 50/50 thing with Webber/board

Going into the season I'm sure as a coach Farke would've preferred to keep his best player than have to try and gel 7 or 8 new players into a new tactical system.

If we had recruited only 2 or 3 players using either loans/permanent deals but kept Emi then I think we'd be better placed to compete at this level.

All goes back to a lack of investment as we had to sell our best asset to recruit anyone. Don't think any manager in the world would do much better in the circumstances

Posted By: roedtonowhere, Oct 25, 17:33:51