you know what im saying is a fact.
If it had been one or two matches then yes, i can see your point, but it was 6 matchs in a row we won when he wasnt in the team. He Returns and we dont win for another 2 months!
He upsets the balance of the team, because of worthys persistance in playing him! He would play him in goal just to make sure he was on the pitch.
If my argument is so paper thin, why cant you argue against it with a reason why he should be in the team or what he adds to the team? Or why we won those games without him? Or why we started to lose when he returned? But no, you just go off on one with personal abuse beacsue your argument is non existent.
Posted By: DiscoDaleGordon, Apr 18, 15:28:57
Written & Designed By Ben Graves 1999-2025