Mildly controversial but

The data isn't HUGELY suggestive of the proposition that *lockdowns* have much more effect than basic WHO social distancing measures, is it?

Was just looking at the "deaths per 100k" stats from a few countries all with their own approaches. Here User Posted Link

What struck me was how Sweden (no lockdowns, just WHO stuff) has lost fewer people per 100k than Spain or France (both massive lockdowners). And Germany (lockdowner) is having just the same curve in this second? third? wave as Sweden.

Anyway, no doubt I'm wrong about this but I was a bit baffled.

Posted By: Old Git, Jan 14, 14:52:30