Haha little fraud. If there are 100 fraudulent votes

for each side. They offset each other. If one side has more then the net effect should be considered.

Your lot are trying to find fraud but there’s inevitably going to be a little bit of that on each side. Like anything, there’s always a tiny % of defects.

You can’t extrapolate a few tiny cases to mean there’s widespread fraud and Trump should have won. It’s about who got the most votes. I can’t see how Trump can prove that with a little bit of natural error here or there (which will be on BOTH sides)

Do you understand that? Seriously?

Posted By: essexcanaryOTBC, Nov 10, 22:09:56