Hmm...

1) What are you then?

2) That's crap. And we've already resolved that it's the fault of both players and manager. But AGAIN, who buys, organises, instructs etc. these players?

3) We do support the players. Just not the manager.

4) That's an assumption that can neither be proved or disproved and is therefore irrelevant to the argument. Even if you are right, and that management is being ignored, surely that only strengthens the argument for him to be removed from his role, and replaced with someone who does influence the players?!?!

Posted By: Dog, Mar 31, 14:44:18