Am 50/50 on this one
Can see the argument that it’s good for discipline but then they have kept on the two who were actually drink driving and have only sacked the one who can’t play and is unlikely to be able to until the end of his contract. Clearly more about saving money than setting an example.
Posted By: Jim, Oct 31, 07:36:19
Follow Ups
- 35If you knew the full story, you’d understand.
Posted By: SexyBennett, Oct 31, 08:36:38 - If they sack the other 2
Posted By: SCC 28, Oct 31, 08:33:57 - brave statement considering
Posted By: ghostof barry butler, Oct 31, 07:54:49 - 3I think they were all lucky not to be sacked, the two driving lucky not to serve time
Posted By: Gazzaman, Oct 31, 07:53:15 - Also offered him to stay on lower wages first.
Posted By: Steve in Holland, Oct 31, 07:52:51
Reply to Message
Written & Designed By Ben Graves 1999-2025