Even if the exercise of the power is held to be justiciable

which I doubt very much, how are the questions of fact to be answered? What if there was more than one purpose? Whose purpose? Which purposes are (as a matter of law) "proper" and which "improper"? The whole enquiry is one which a Court couldn't possibly (or at least, I think wouldn't want to) embark upon.

Posted By: paulg, Sep 11, 14:23:19