It’s perfectly valid constitutionally but....

Is clear why they’re doing it and maybe isn’t cricket but then remain have been perfectly happy to abuse precedent when it suits them...and I say that as someone else who would on balance (just) wants to stay in

The best analogy I can think of is a cup match where a side is going through on away goals and is doing he worst time wasting and fouling ever to run the clock down. Then it hits 90 mins and they concede....

Now the other side starts making tactical substitutions to waste the remaining time and the fans are screaming that it’s cheating and not fair....

Everyone knows why they’re doing it but you know damn well that hypocrit Corbyn would do the same or a lot worse...

Posted By: matgore, Aug 31, 10:00:09