What are you talking about.

If person A has been in the job 5 years and each year received pay rises reflected on performance and gained experience in said job. Then why the hell should person B who is newly promoted into said job be entitled to matching pay when person B has neither performed or gained experienced within the job to justify the same salary.

And your answer to this apparent "injustice" is to then increase the responsibility/workload of Person A to offset the difference in pay.

That now means that it is not the same job. Which completely misses the entire point.

So your way to make everything fair is to promote person a when you promote person b?

Posted By: Basingstoke_Canary_J, May 22, 16:37:28