But having obviously read the whole thread...

you will have realised that some of my glib comments (at the end of my own serious, reasoned POV) were in direct response to his own glibness. It in no way clouded my arguments or POV. I picked holes in his 'blind faith, head in the sand' approach, by basing my argument on FACT.

Shame that you fail to acknowledge that I do have a point of view, and just cherry-pick what you want, to ridicule me and those who HAVE put forward a reasoned debate.

As I mentioned above (and you failed to respond to)...
User Posted Link I would love to. Sadly I haven't encountered anyone as yet who can put forward a strong case as to why keeping Worthington would be in the long term interests of NCFC.

Can you Clare? Can I have a reasoned debate with you to help you off the middle ground you so conveniently occupy??

Posted By: Jim Nasium, Mar 2, 13:24:04