I'm going to be a right government patsy here

and suggest that our boys and girls haven't just accused two random tourists for s**ts and giggles. Because if they *had*, the story would probably unravel quite quickly.

Perhaps let's not begin the push back at 'was Stonehenge closed' but instead consider whether these two 'tourists' from the 'fitness industry' could possibly haved chosen to present rather better evidence of their identities and intentions - thus skewering the allegations - than an unchallenging chat with the state run tv station in an unidentifiable location and a few wikipedia stats about Salisbury?

Posted By: norway, Sep 14, 15:05:43