FAO SCC: Sacking managers regularly

Swansea: season after season, sack manager, have a little new manager bounce, then end up back in the relegation battle. Repeat. Have not improved at all with this strategy.

Palace: Sacked manager after about 2 games. No idea if this is a club you should be aspiring to be. Also no idea if De Boer might have turned things around having not had a minute to turn up.

WBA: Sacked manager, still s**t. Scored about 2 goals since Pardew arrived

Stoke: 1 game vs Huddersfield. Not proof that sacking the manager is the answer. Gunn won his first game 4-0.

Leicester: ? Sacked title winning manager and ended up having to sack the guy they replaced him with and are no better off than if they'd stuck with Ranieri.

West Ham: Have improved, but stuck with Bilic for years. You could say they stuck with Bilic for too long, and would be saying that if you were a West Ham fan.

Watford: Sack manager every season. Remain roughly in the same position each year.

Everton: Not a comparable sized club to Norwich, but are still s**t despite Sam taking over.

Norwich: Sack Alex Neil. In a worse position the next season.

Posted By: Charles21, Jan 23, 10:29:22