I simply don't get it

as below, we know Wes and Naismith doesn't work, and we know of the two, Wes is by some distance the better Number Ten(tm).

Is it really so much of a stretch that we might start Wes+Maddison, combined with Pritchard or Canos or a Murphy, as that line of three? I don't think it is, and I'd really have liked to see us give it a go at some point.

I guess Mads will learn a bit and bulk up a little at ABZ but I can't help wondering if it's really necessary for him and wise for us. Certainly Naismith is a busted flush.

Posted By: Old Man, Aug 31, 22:53:23