Bit misleading isn't it?

Why does it start in 2003? Is it just because that was the point where the financial s**t and points deductions forced Leeds to sell anyone of value while spending next to nothing on replacements? Not like they had a choice at that point.
Is there a similar table starting from 2010, when they rejoined the Championship with us and when their financial problems were supposedly behind them?

Posted By: mr carra, Aug 29, 15:44:32