But you are admonishing me a little for my response to the article, no?

which is fine! But my irritated reaction is just part of the debate I hope.

However I wouldn't want to blur the distinction between the article itself and your presentation of it as a discussion. I accept the logic and benefit of provocation and free speech as a way to properly consider issues. I just thought his argument was deeply flawed.

But I'm glad you posted it and, as I said, I found the discussion interesting.

Posted By: norway, Aug 18, 23:47:18